-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
css.types.basic-shape.shape - add note about unimplemented via
to with
change
#26756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Spec history:
I think it would actually make sense to add a behavioral subfeature |
Also, |
If support has landed in Chrome stable, it should also be available in Edge. @OnkarRuikar Would you have a small test case to determine which syntax a browser supports? |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
@caugner I've made one: https://jsbin.com/yiwugowugo/1/edit?html,js,output Outputs from some browsers:
|
What type of issue is this?
Missing compatibility data
What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?
The shape() function had a syntax change recently. The
via
keyword was renamed towith
in the syntax.What browsers does this problem apply to, if applicable?
No response
What did you expect to see?
It would be great if a note is added to BCD saying the function is still using
via
instead ofwith
. Add the note for Chrome, Edge, Firefox. No need for Safari because it has released the change in prod.Did you test this? If so, how?
In a local Linux dev environment.
Can you link to any release notes, bugs, pull requests, or MDN pages related to this?
Do you have anything more you want to share?
No response
MDN URL
No response
MDN metadata
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: